As I write, Germany lacks the Affirmative Action policies found in North America, where acceptance letters, positions, appointments, honors and promotions increasingly go to "racial minorities" to satisfy quotas for diversity. Nonetheless, thanks to the influence of modern culture and its diversity imperatives, Germany has the same rub - and now, five young ladies, competing for the ceremonial role of the "Christ child of Nuremberg" at Germany's oldest Christmas market, are feeling the burn of diversity, too:
The five not selected for the position had one thing in common: they were not as "ethnic" as Benigna Munsi, the girl chosen to be Germany's next "Christ child of Nuremberg". Munsi is of Indian descent...
Of course, for anyone who is familiar with how the gears turn under the influence of "modernity" in Germany, the outcome of the contest was predictable. Ironically, though, Germany is actually some years behind the times with the program it is following.
Before we dive into the analysis, note that "the Christ child", is actually another name for Jesus, and the ones competing for that name and title are all girls; add in that the contest dates back to 1969, and you can really start to sniff out just what this contest is, and see why one of the finalists has blue hair. There was probably a time, in fact, when "blue-haired girl" might have been favorite, as her physical appearance and demeanor suggests all that is synonymous with "the strong independent woman who is stalwart and free-spirited" (the type not likely to marry, have children or be satisfied with traditional roles, which Germany's mainstream culture was promoting despite all warnings). But we live in an era where Germany has moved on to a completely new era of counter-traditional virtue-signaling, where the focus is making the national community into an international and diverse one. That said, nobody should be surprised to see a migrant child getting the nomination to play the "Christ child" at Germany oldest Christmas market.
On the other hand, Munsi's triumph in that regard is somewhat of a surprise; you see, the push for diversity has generally involved elevating and glamorizing non-European men (1, 2) but not necessarily non-European women. Whether this is a coincidence is up for debate. But, as a result of that norm, European men and women have grown apart with diverging and conflicting expectations about internationalization, which has not only undermined the resistance to mass immigration in Europe, but decreased the likelihood of European men and women bonding as outsiders looking in, producing families and children influenced by that bond, where pro-immigration propaganda runs off its subjects like rainwater. Instead, because European women were not put into position to oppose mass immigration, that same propaganda - depicting opponents of immigration as grunting, unwanted men who cannot find jobs - has kept European men from revealing their politics and European women from gravitating towards opponents of immigration:
Taking all of this into consideration, it is kind of interesting to watch diversity creep into the "Christ child" pageant and target the female sphere; so seldom have European females been allowed to see an outcome of diversity where they are asked to take the back seat to anything, lest it jostle their perception of an internationalized society where they remain at the top of the female pecking order or "replacement theory" is nothing but grunting noise by stupid loser men. But, as the outcome of the "Christ child" pageant shows, European females are no longer being shielded from seeing their disenfranchisement and replacement. We see a new phase, where European women are no longer given watered-down impressions of globalism, probably because it is useless to play that hand after all the terrorism and rapes by migrants in recent years.
Then again, as events in North America (and Sweden) show, even that sort of no-holds-barred internationalism is not a good enough endpoint for the new modernity; the new modernity also includes a push for no-holds-barred transgenderism, making the old mode of "let-us-celebrate-LGBT-once-a-year-and-otherwise-not-mistreat-them" completely insufficient. Now, we are told that a woman is nothing other than a person who claims to be one, and biological women are banned from social media if they dare say otherwise; we also get drag queen story hours, and are supposed to be pleased to find that federal money is being used to fund drag shows. What we appear to be moving towards, which some can only see now, is the final phase of all social transformation, where people become just people and everything else is just a classification from yesterday. Perhaps that was the goal from the start...
Remarkably, because women in North America and Sweden have been groomed to advocate for sexual liberation and their own gender-bending, many have come to accept the transition to no-holds-barred transgenderism without question - even where their social privileges as women are now being compromised in the process.
That brings us back to Germany. Most of the population there still runs on "social justice warrior version 1.0" and has not yet received instructions to enthusiastically push for more transgender everything, i.e. no-holds-barred transgenderism. Thus, unlike in North America or Sweden, transgenderism largely remains what it was in Germany a decade ago: something you are to take pride in tolerating in the name of tolerance and democracy, or something to react to just as one might react to an imaginative and overactive child - or clown:
Some will even recall that drag queen Olivia Jones famously roasted German right-wing conservatives and nationalists in a video segment that functioned something like George Orwell's 'Two Minutes Hate' in Nineteeneightyfour...
In any case, the forces of transgenderism - and LGBT - are not driving modern German culture at present. And that means nobody is dictating that transvestites and drag queens are lined up to be appointed the "Christ child" - at least, not yet.
Accordingly, you cannot help but laugh when nobody responds to the "Christ child" finalists the way the North Americans (and Swedes) surely would: with outrage that transgenders and LGBT are not represented. All we see are people on the program "social justice warrior version 1.0", praising the selection of Benigna Munsi and yelling wildly because some arm of the German right-wing conservative political party, Alternative for Germany (AfD), suggested that Munsi's nomination as the "Christ child" represents Germans going the way of the other Indians - the ones in North America, who were replaced by migrants:
 |
| Guess which five got the short end of the diversity stick? |
The five not selected for the position had one thing in common: they were not as "ethnic" as Benigna Munsi, the girl chosen to be Germany's next "Christ child of Nuremberg". Munsi is of Indian descent...
 |
| Benigna Munsi |
Of course, for anyone who is familiar with how the gears turn under the influence of "modernity" in Germany, the outcome of the contest was predictable. Ironically, though, Germany is actually some years behind the times with the program it is following.
Before we dive into the analysis, note that "the Christ child", is actually another name for Jesus, and the ones competing for that name and title are all girls; add in that the contest dates back to 1969, and you can really start to sniff out just what this contest is, and see why one of the finalists has blue hair. There was probably a time, in fact, when "blue-haired girl" might have been favorite, as her physical appearance and demeanor suggests all that is synonymous with "the strong independent woman who is stalwart and free-spirited" (the type not likely to marry, have children or be satisfied with traditional roles, which Germany's mainstream culture was promoting despite all warnings). But we live in an era where Germany has moved on to a completely new era of counter-traditional virtue-signaling, where the focus is making the national community into an international and diverse one. That said, nobody should be surprised to see a migrant child getting the nomination to play the "Christ child" at Germany oldest Christmas market.
On the other hand, Munsi's triumph in that regard is somewhat of a surprise; you see, the push for diversity has generally involved elevating and glamorizing non-European men (1, 2) but not necessarily non-European women. Whether this is a coincidence is up for debate. But, as a result of that norm, European men and women have grown apart with diverging and conflicting expectations about internationalization, which has not only undermined the resistance to mass immigration in Europe, but decreased the likelihood of European men and women bonding as outsiders looking in, producing families and children influenced by that bond, where pro-immigration propaganda runs off its subjects like rainwater. Instead, because European women were not put into position to oppose mass immigration, that same propaganda - depicting opponents of immigration as grunting, unwanted men who cannot find jobs - has kept European men from revealing their politics and European women from gravitating towards opponents of immigration:
 |
| A supporter of Germany's early anti-immigration party (NPD) with a poster edited to say "we r not so dum as we ap pear". The poster is chock full of grammatical errors and spelling mistakes. |
Then again, as events in North America (and Sweden) show, even that sort of no-holds-barred internationalism is not a good enough endpoint for the new modernity; the new modernity also includes a push for no-holds-barred transgenderism, making the old mode of "let-us-celebrate-LGBT-once-a-year-and-otherwise-not-mistreat-them" completely insufficient. Now, we are told that a woman is nothing other than a person who claims to be one, and biological women are banned from social media if they dare say otherwise; we also get drag queen story hours, and are supposed to be pleased to find that federal money is being used to fund drag shows. What we appear to be moving towards, which some can only see now, is the final phase of all social transformation, where people become just people and everything else is just a classification from yesterday. Perhaps that was the goal from the start...
Start:
patriarchal, spiritual society within a state that supports said society
patriarchal, spiritual society within a state that supports said society
⇩
promote watered-down feminism to degree that hides the worst
⇩
promote no-holds-barred feminism, too
⇩
promote watered-down globalism to degree that hides the worst
⇩
promote watered-down transgenderism to degree that hides the worst
⇩
⇩
promote no-holds-barred globalism and transgenderism, too (you are here)
⇩
End:
corporate-led society where people have no identity
beyond what they consume or produce, extending
across as many states as possible that support said society
corporate-led society where people have no identity
beyond what they consume or produce, extending
across as many states as possible that support said society
Remarkably, because women in North America and Sweden have been groomed to advocate for sexual liberation and their own gender-bending, many have come to accept the transition to no-holds-barred transgenderism without question - even where their social privileges as women are now being compromised in the process.
That brings us back to Germany. Most of the population there still runs on "social justice warrior version 1.0" and has not yet received instructions to enthusiastically push for more transgender everything, i.e. no-holds-barred transgenderism. Thus, unlike in North America or Sweden, transgenderism largely remains what it was in Germany a decade ago: something you are to take pride in tolerating in the name of tolerance and democracy, or something to react to just as one might react to an imaginative and overactive child - or clown:
 |
| Trans-woman Olivia Jones with German chancellor Angela Merkel. Now do you see where I got the clown parallel? |
Some will even recall that drag queen Olivia Jones famously roasted German right-wing conservatives and nationalists in a video segment that functioned something like George Orwell's 'Two Minutes Hate' in Nineteeneightyfour...
In any case, the forces of transgenderism - and LGBT - are not driving modern German culture at present. And that means nobody is dictating that transvestites and drag queens are lined up to be appointed the "Christ child" - at least, not yet.
 |
| The future "Christ child of Nuremberg", mark my words |
 |
| The tweet generating controversy: "Nuremberg has a new 'Christ child'. One of these days what happened to the Indians will happen to us." |
Under the url that translates into "I apologize for people who go through the world with this viewpoint" (es-tut-mir-leid-fuer-die-menschen-die-mit-dieser-sicht-durch-die-welt-gehen), the Zürichsee Zeitung joined the rest of the German politicians and German mainstream media choir - die Zeit, die Welt, Tagesspiegel, Der Spiegel - in a display of virtue-signaling pageantry along those lines. Little do they all realize that celebrating non-European "minorities" is so 1999, and what they are soon going to be pushed to feel just as passionate about whether trans-women/LGBT are represented. They may not know it now, but they will soon be shouting "where is the LGBT Christ child? And they will soon be writing "I apologize for people who go through the world with this viewpoint" in reference to the Christians who dare question any of this.
Of course, Germany is not at this point yet, even though North America and Sweden certainly are. So, what is the hold up? Are the culture-pushers of the mainstream afraid that Germany's Christians are not conditioned enough to accept the next stage? Are the culture-pushers of the mainstream afraid the German public is not conditioned enough to understand that the favorite slurs - bigot, Neon-Nazi, far-right extremist, etc. - should now be extended towards those who resist idea of an LGBT Christ child? Are the culture-pushers afraid that Christians would be turned into AfD voters who ignore the preachers that do their best to try to stop this?
