For those who have an interest in third-party politics, there is perhaps nothing more disheartening than seeing city after city awash in a sea of goofy advertisements for the major political parties that, thanks to their elite donors and media support, are all but certain to keep deciding the course that the country will take:
But what happens when you see that such posters or billboards have been vandalized?
My immediate reaction is to think that at least one person - maybe more - got tired of being bombarded by smiling images of fake compassion and cheesy slogans; that at least one person - maybe more - was willing to risk a citation for vandalism just to make a statement. For those interested in third-party politics, perhaps nothing can be more uplifting.
That brings us to whoever did this:
If your goal is to turn advertisements for the major political parties into an "anti-advertisement" with the least effort and maximized result, it is hard to think of a more potent mix. After all, when the advertisements are transformed so the politicians are "red-nosed" and resemble clowns, how much credibility do those politicians retain?
Would you elect a candidate who looks like the kind to make animal balloons in office or squirt world leaders with water from a fake flower? Do you trust such a man to run your country? Of course not.
Factor in the popularity of the clown world meme, and the mental association that "red-nosed" political advertisements brings in connection with that meme, and you can really begin to see a storm brewing. In connection with that popularity and association, "red-nosing" political advertisements to get laughs and attention could become the next big thing to do. For the major political parties - who have advertisements for their candidates crammed into every nook and cranny of public space, and use that blanketing to project power - nothing could be more disastrous.
Just as importantly, the clown world meme is linked to the growing, dissident political movement that is spreading it; accordingly, the "red-nosed" political campaign posters become instant publicity and advertising for that movement, at no risk to those who are most likely to benefit from the action, against the major political parties that would oppose it. The link remains until the posters are completely restored or removed.
So is it any wonder establishment politicians are concerned about the popularity and visibility of the clown world meme and in no mood to laugh along?
But there is more to consider, because the prevalence of the clown world meme also changes what one thinks of when presented with rainbow-colored imagery.
As anyone born before the 1980s might recall, rainbows were once associated with Christianity. Now, they are mostly associated with LGBT parades and culture. But here is the thing about the prevalence of the clown world meme: it turns rainbow-colored whatever to a reference to clown world, and does so in a way that suggests that item belongs to, and thus contains all the absurdity of, clown world.
Ergo, we see the same sort of anti-advertisement that "red nosing" creates.
So, once again, is it any wonder establishment politicians are concerned about the popularity and visibility of the clown world meme and in no mood to laugh along? The establishment, embracing the globalist and anti-national and anti-traditional properties of LGBT, has wrapped itself in rainbow imagery ad absurdum:
In doing so, perhaps the establishment is looking to virtue signal or pander for votes, since LGBT is in vogue; or, perhaps the establishment knows that the promotion of LGBT can bring about population control it can benefit from, as LGBT culture pacifies while providing an outlet for the angry and ostracized, and also contributes to literal population control, through depopulation via homosexual non-reproduction. Whatever the case, the establishment has made its support of LGBT clear.
Multinational corporations have also put themselves behind LGBT:
For multinational corporations, the goal may also be to virtue signal and attract the LGBT base. But more than this - more than doing it for the feelz or lucrative marketing - their leaders may realize that LGBT ushers forth a borderless, universal culture that plays well to the interests of multi-national corporations and their one-world, global market schemes.
Whether mainstream politician or multinational corporation, there were reasons to embrace rainbow symbology and endorse LGBT. Amidst the popularity of the clown world meme, however, both are trapped by the non-intended association with the clown world meme:
And it gets worse for both of them, because when things are introduced that make the consequences of "damn-the-consequences" shameless LGBT promotion apparent - like having children groomed to dress as drag queen hypersexuals or mutilate their genitalia while waving the LGBT rainbow flag - the subconscious link suggesting that rainbow-colored things are part of the clown world meme becomes, through such examples, an example-driven argument that the LGBT movement is indeed evidence that we live in a clown world. The examples pointing in that direction are everywhere:
Amidst these examples, everything draped in the same, LGBT banner would be under the same, long shadow of absurdity - and contaminated. There would emerge a tendency to associate "rainbowed things" with the absurd. So, is it really any wonder that multinational corporations are banning the clown world meme when the politicians they support most are most prone to be burdened by it?
Is any of it really a surprise, since multinational corporations - keen to ally with LGBT - are endorsing the rainbow colors and prone to mockery if people see the rainbow colors and instantly think of clown world?
But what happens when you see that such posters or billboards have been vandalized?
My immediate reaction is to think that at least one person - maybe more - got tired of being bombarded by smiling images of fake compassion and cheesy slogans; that at least one person - maybe more - was willing to risk a citation for vandalism just to make a statement. For those interested in third-party politics, perhaps nothing can be more uplifting.
That brings us to whoever did this:
If your goal is to turn advertisements for the major political parties into an "anti-advertisement" with the least effort and maximized result, it is hard to think of a more potent mix. After all, when the advertisements are transformed so the politicians are "red-nosed" and resemble clowns, how much credibility do those politicians retain?
Would you elect a candidate who looks like the kind to make animal balloons in office or squirt world leaders with water from a fake flower? Do you trust such a man to run your country? Of course not.
Factor in the popularity of the clown world meme, and the mental association that "red-nosed" political advertisements brings in connection with that meme, and you can really begin to see a storm brewing. In connection with that popularity and association, "red-nosing" political advertisements to get laughs and attention could become the next big thing to do. For the major political parties - who have advertisements for their candidates crammed into every nook and cranny of public space, and use that blanketing to project power - nothing could be more disastrous.
Just as importantly, the clown world meme is linked to the growing, dissident political movement that is spreading it; accordingly, the "red-nosed" political campaign posters become instant publicity and advertising for that movement, at no risk to those who are most likely to benefit from the action, against the major political parties that would oppose it. The link remains until the posters are completely restored or removed.
So is it any wonder establishment politicians are concerned about the popularity and visibility of the clown world meme and in no mood to laugh along?
But there is more to consider, because the prevalence of the clown world meme also changes what one thinks of when presented with rainbow-colored imagery.
As anyone born before the 1980s might recall, rainbows were once associated with Christianity. Now, they are mostly associated with LGBT parades and culture. But here is the thing about the prevalence of the clown world meme: it turns rainbow-colored whatever to a reference to clown world, and does so in a way that suggests that item belongs to, and thus contains all the absurdity of, clown world.
Ergo, we see the same sort of anti-advertisement that "red nosing" creates.
So, once again, is it any wonder establishment politicians are concerned about the popularity and visibility of the clown world meme and in no mood to laugh along? The establishment, embracing the globalist and anti-national and anti-traditional properties of LGBT, has wrapped itself in rainbow imagery ad absurdum:
 |
| Top: Canada's new LGBT coin Below: Canada's Prime Minister Justin Trudeau joins an LGBT parade |
In doing so, perhaps the establishment is looking to virtue signal or pander for votes, since LGBT is in vogue; or, perhaps the establishment knows that the promotion of LGBT can bring about population control it can benefit from, as LGBT culture pacifies while providing an outlet for the angry and ostracized, and also contributes to literal population control, through depopulation via homosexual non-reproduction. Whatever the case, the establishment has made its support of LGBT clear.
Multinational corporations have also put themselves behind LGBT:
For multinational corporations, the goal may also be to virtue signal and attract the LGBT base. But more than this - more than doing it for the feelz or lucrative marketing - their leaders may realize that LGBT ushers forth a borderless, universal culture that plays well to the interests of multi-national corporations and their one-world, global market schemes.
Whether mainstream politician or multinational corporation, there were reasons to embrace rainbow symbology and endorse LGBT. Amidst the popularity of the clown world meme, however, both are trapped by the non-intended association with the clown world meme:
And it gets worse for both of them, because when things are introduced that make the consequences of "damn-the-consequences" shameless LGBT promotion apparent - like having children groomed to dress as drag queen hypersexuals or mutilate their genitalia while waving the LGBT rainbow flag - the subconscious link suggesting that rainbow-colored things are part of the clown world meme becomes, through such examples, an example-driven argument that the LGBT movement is indeed evidence that we live in a clown world. The examples pointing in that direction are everywhere:
Amidst these examples, everything draped in the same, LGBT banner would be under the same, long shadow of absurdity - and contaminated. There would emerge a tendency to associate "rainbowed things" with the absurd. So, is it really any wonder that multinational corporations are banning the clown world meme when the politicians they support most are most prone to be burdened by it?
Is any of it really a surprise, since multinational corporations - keen to ally with LGBT - are endorsing the rainbow colors and prone to mockery if people see the rainbow colors and instantly think of clown world?
