"Sort of a punch in the face to anyone who is trying to stop the browning of America"

on


Now just wait a second here. I thought the idea that "brown" is trying to turn the country "brown" is a racist and sexist doctrine:




Wikipedia, citing mainstream corporate news and other so-called "reliable sources", considers the whole thing a "conspiracy theory":
The white genocide, white extinction,[1][2][3][4][5] or white replacement conspiracy theory[6][7][8] is a white supremacist[9][10][11][12] belief that there is a deliberate plot, often blamed on Jews,[9][12] to promote miscegenation, mass non-white immigration, racial integration, low fertility rates, abortion, governmental land-confiscation from whites, organised violence,[13] and eliminationism in supposedly white-founded countries[9] in order to cause the extinction of whites through forced assimilation[13] and violent genocide.[14][15][16][17] Less frequently, blacks,[18] Hispanics,[19] and Muslims[20] are blamed, but merely as more fertile immigrants,[21] invaders,[22] or violent aggressors,[23] rather than masterminds of a secret plot.[24]

White genocide is a myth,[25][26] based on pseudoscience, pseudohistory, and hatred,[27] driven by a psychological panic often termed white extinction anxiety.[28][19] There is no evidence that white people are dying out or that they will die out, or that anyone is trying to exterminate them as a race.[29][30][31][32] The purpose of the conspiracy theory is to scare white people,[29] and justify a commitment to a white nationalist agenda[33] in support of increasingly successful calls to violence.[25][23][22] Proponents have killed hundreds and injured several hundred more since 2011.

The theory was popularized by white supremacist, neo-Nazi, and convicted felon David Lane around 1995, and has been leveraged as propaganda in Europe, North America, South Africa, and Australia. Similar conspiracy theories were prevalent in Nazi Germany[34] and have been used in present-day interchangeably with,[35] and as a broader and more extreme version of, Renaud Camus's 2012 The Great Replacement, focusing on the white Christian population of France.[36][37] Since the 2019 Christchurch and El Paso shootings, of which the shooters' manifestos decried a "white replacement" and have named The Great Replacement; author Bat Ye'or's 2002 Eurabia concept,[38] Camus's 2012 Great Replacement fallacy (often called replacement theory or population replacement),[39] and Gerd Honsik's resurgent 1970s myth of a Kalergi plan,[35] have all been used synonymously with "white genocide" and are increasingly referred to as variations of the conspiracy theory.

As shown above, Wikipedia also states that the theory was devised so those who believe in it can scare people, justify white nationalism and incite people to violence. Notice the use of the word "and", which means that, in the eyes of whoever wrote this article or is responsible for the articles that it cites, these events are not mutually exclusive and all true. Meanwhile, as our leaders push us to accept boatloads of non-white refugees on European shores, urge us to fight wars that break up countries and cause non-white migration surges, remain silent about white male suicides, deliver funds to NGOs that are devoted to importing non-whites and seek to prevent us from stopping said NGOs, we have a culture that turns white women against white men and to non-white men, increasingly panders to non-whites exclusively and derides or belittles white men, especially if they resist (1, 2); under these circumstances, where every outcome furthers white replacement, we have to accept that it is all just a coincidence and unintended consequence. If you do not, you are a conspiracy theorist, apparently - as opposed to when you accept, without evidence, that replacement theory was designed to scare people, create support for white nationalism and inspire violence at the same time.

These "reliable sources" will tell you the same thing:
  1. ^ Barbara Korte; Simon Wendt; Nicole Falkenhayner (10 April 2019). Heroism as a Global Phenomenon in Contemporary Culture. Taylor & Francis. ISBN 978-0-429-55784-2. The conspiracy theory, which was first articulated by French Philosopher Renaud Camus, has gained a lot of traction in Europe since 2015. It holds that the Christian population of Europe is currently being replaced by Muslims, and that this has been planned and is now carefully orchestrated by a group of conspirators.
  2. ^ Charles Sowerwine (25 January 2018). France since 1870. Palgrave. p. 460. ISBN 978-1-137-40611-8. A sinister plot for the "progressive replacement, over a few decades, of the historic population of our country by immigrants, the vast majority of them non-European
  3. ^ Froio, Caterina (September 2018). "Race, religion, or culture? Framing Islam between racism and neo-racism in the online network of the french far right". Perspectives on Politics. 16 (3): 704. Retrieved 4 April 2019. For instance, some websites...endorse the conspiracy theory of the Grand remplacement (Great replacement) positing the “Islamo-substitution” of biologically autochthonous populations in the French metropolitan territory, by Muslim minorities mostly coming from sub-Saharan Africa and the Maghreb.
  4. ^ Gabriel, Trip (15 Jan 2019). "A Timeline of Steve King's Racist Remarks and Divisive Actions". The New York Times. Retrieved 4 April 2019. Mr. King demonstrates familiarity with the “Great Replacement” conspiracy theory, also known as “white genocide,” which posits that an international elite, including prominent Jews like George Soros, are plotting to make white populations minorities in Europe and North America.
  5. ^ Bennhold, Katrin (27 March 2019). "Donation From New Zealand Attack Suspect Puts Spotlight on Europe's Far Right". The New York Times. Retrieved 4 April 2019. It is essentially a conspiracy theory that accuses liberal politicians of deliberately acting to supplant white Europeans with Muslims through mass migration and higher birthrates.
  6. ^ "Austria may disband far-right group over link to NZ attack suspect". BBC. 28 March 2019. Retrieved 4 April 2019. They have spread a conspiracy theory on the web known as "the great replacement", which sees immigrants as a threat to "white" Western culture. That theory was in Mr Tarrant's "manifesto".
  7. ^ Bowles, Nellie (18 March 2019). "'Replacement Theory,' a Racist, Sexist Doctrine, Spreads in Far-Right Circles". The New York Times. Retrieved 4 April 2019. Behind the idea is a racist conspiracy theory known as “the replacement theory,” which was popularized by a right-wing French philosopher. An extension of colonialist theory, it is predicated on the notion that white women are not having enough children and that falling birthrates will lead to white people around the world being replaced by nonwhite people.
  8. ^ "Why white nationalist terrorism is a global threat". The Economist. 21 March 2019. Retrieved 4 April 2019. “The Great Replacement”, repeated a staple far-right conspiracy theory: that non-white and Muslim immigrants in Western countries are invaders, ushered in by scheming elites to replace ethnic-European populations.
  9. ^ Addley, Esther (22 November 2018). "Study shows 60% of Britons believe in conspiracy theories". Retrieved 4 April 2019. A striking 31% of leave voters believed that Muslim immigration was part of a wider plot to make Muslims the majority in Britain, a conspiracy theory that originated in French far-right circles that was known as the “great replacement”. The comparable figure for remain voters was 6%.
  10. ^ Childs, Simon (3 October 2018). "The 'Deeply Worrying' Far-Right Booklets Distributed at Tory Conference". Vice. Retrieved 4 April 2019. The Great Replacement is the name of a far-right conspiracy theory that believes Western culture is being systematically "replaced" by the culture of immigrants from third-world continents, or as "Moralitis" puts it: "Immigrants from continents oppressed by Western cultural, economic and military imperialism" who are "pawns for the revolutionary zeal of cultural Marxism.
  11. "The Myth of White Genocide" Harper's March 2019
  12. "hard to overstate how common the South African genocide myth is in white supremacist and white nationalist circles" Reveal August 2018
  13. "The South Africans pushing the 'white genocide' myth" CNN November 2018
  14. "The dangerous myth of 'white genocide'" SPLC August 2018
  15. "despite long-running international efforts to debunk the idea of a “white genocide,” Facebook was still selling advertisers the ability to market to those with an interest in that myth just days after the bloodshed." The Intercept November 2018
  16. "The deadly myth of 'White Genocide'" Australian Broadcasting Corporation March 2019

And so will these additional "reliable sources":

A quick search reveals the wide labelling of this thought as a "conspiracy theory" across multiple reliable sources, including academic sources (multiple cited in lead section), news organizations (DW, The Guardian, The Atlantic), and organizations such as Amadeu Antonio Foundation, Southern Poverty Law Center and Hope Not Hate. And this is only looking at the English sources. The article on the French wiki is filled with references to conspiracy ("du complot") [...]. Al-Andalusi (talk) 17:28, 24 September 2018 (UTC)

As you can see, some people are still asking questions nevertheless:

How is White genocide conspiracy theory based on pseudoscience? [...] Anonymous 16 January 2020 (UTC)

And getting answers:


Racial admixture is neither genocide, which implies homicide, or a conspiracy theory, which implies deceit and/or coercion. Nor does it imply the extinction of any races, because of the tendency of people to be attracted to those of similar appearance more often than not. It's also generally meaningless because phenotypes are secondary characteristics to genetic ancestry, just along for the ride. Both reinforcement and hybridization are elements of genetic robustness, but have little to do with phenotypic appearance or physiology. The article clearly needs to explain these facts better, with WP:MEDRS sources. EllenCT (talk) 21:11, 16 January 2020 (UTC)

Did you catch that? Clearing away the psychobabble, user EllenCT is basically saying the destruction of white people is a conspiracy theory because white is not a valid classification to categorize people for this and that reason. But, as it turns out, the same line of thought could be used to dismiss the validity of any categorization of people; take, for example, the idea that certain groups can be defined based on their beliefs, tradition or culture. All you have to do is argue that beliefs, traditions and culture are merely abstract ideas in the minds of people. There is always some way to marginalize whatever distinction one wishes to write off so as to eliminate the classification itself. The consequence, interestingly enough, is that there would never be such a thing as genocide, because there would be no groups of people, just people...




Note how user EllenCT also suggests that the destruction of white people does is not a genocide because genocide "implies" homicide and, as implied in her opinion, homicide is not taking place. We can assume that, if shown instances where a white person is murdered because somebody hates white people, user EllenCT would defend her view by saying these are isolated events and do not rise up to the threshold which is necessary to say a trend of anti-white homicide is a thing. Meanwhile, so many homicides are already outside of her tally because, thanks to press censorship, there is an increasing likelihood that the public will never know the race of the murderer, or the murder will go unreported entirely. Furthermore, there is still a tendency to write off white people being murdered by non-whites as something where the racial element to the crime is just a coincidence. There is a lot of pressure on the state and media to do exactly that. So, unless the murderer screams out that the motivation is to kill whites, you can pretty much kiss the the association with a trend of anti-white homicide goodbye. Just look at how incapable the public is of picking up the racial angle of something more more visible, like anti-white bias via the cultural depiction of white men (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6), based on the fact that we never hear about it.

Of course, EllenCT is not even correct in her assessment that genocide "implies" homicide; we see that in the Wikipedia snippet above, as well as in the United Nations' own criteria for genocide. But what EllenCT did with her assessment is another classic academic maneuver - no different from the delegitimization and decategorization efforts we discussed previously - where the goal is to move the goalposts and keep what is happening to whites from being described in a way that raises eyebrows. Putting what is happening outside the sphere of emotion-carrying known words like "genocide" - and into the basket of a different, emotion-carrying known word like "conspiracy theory" - completely changes, and limits, the conversation.

But here is the real eye-opener: what is happening to white people is kept on the turf it is on because, in spite of all that is being done by politicians and the culture as noted earlier, and in spite of all that is causing the destruction of white people, nobody can prove that the common outcome is deliberate and according to a plan to bring about said outcome. It does not matter that people like Mark Potok, who work for a "reliable source" like the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC), keep track of white decline even though that research has never found its way into a single article he wrote for the SPLC:





And it does not matter that those tracking the changes and influencing the culture keep resetting the narrative to the latest view that the public has been conditioned to accept:




Once you begin to think critically, the blinders fall off fairly quickly, exposing the whole operation. Small wonder they want to control the internet and use their "reliable sources", cherry-picked definitions and emotional playwords to control what you think. Open your eyes.


Or not...


Share Button