January 15, 2008

A look at the war on whiteness

They call themselves humanists. Others call themselves multiculturalists. Whatever you want to call them, our children are under their control.

That is why our children will learn about other cultures more often than their own and why they will hear about the likes of Martin Luther King, Anne Frank and Harriet Tubman over and over again; that is why they will learn that their forefathers were racist white people who did terrible things and be made to feel guilty for these deeds. Forget the fact that Whites accomplished tremendous feats like the building of western civilization, the system thinks it would be better if our children only knew about the bad things they did and all the wonderful contributions made by non-Whites, like fireworks and peanut products.

Little changes if the individual ends up going to college. In fact, the dosage of propaganda only increases, now administered daily by people who like to call themselves "intellectuals." Like the Soviets before them, their main goal is to create the foundation for one humanity, a fantasy world of equality and tolerance. However, whites are not invited to come as they are. Whites are first made to feel guilty for things that their ancestors may or may not have done. Then they must sit back and smile as their homelands are overrun and cultures replaced. In order to be accepted in this New World Order, whites must defend everyone and everything except for themselves. Naturally, the only whites suitable for this sort of future are those who are but a shadow of their forebears, the ones who have already sold out their people and become self-absorbed money-worshipers.

In the Soviet Union, identity distortion was critical for the plan to rebuild one humanity. Today, the left employs the same tactics in the United States. Political correctness is one example of an attempt to create identity distortion. Similarly, there is a constant re-funneling of identity, emotion and pride into things that are generic and anti-national, such as consumer culture, fashion, pop culture, even the world of sports.

Television, movies and video games are also handy tools for the social marxist agenda. Not only are these forms of entertainment loaded with multicultural casts and messages but they all allow mankind to be reduced to the same basic level: a passive viewer, a button pusher. And then there is pornography.

Similar to video games, movies and television, pornography makes an appeal to the lowest common denominator of all mankind. Never mind that this common denominator is man reduced to a pleasure-seeking, primitive animal, little more than a Neanderthal; never mind the fact that the human race would never have built the world we live in had it never been allowed to advance beyond a self-masturbatory level - standards are being lowered in order to create a manageable, but not altogether capable, "mass man". Naturally, it is harder to bring people up to a standard than it is to spoil those who are capable and bring these people down.





For the purpose of the multi-mixing "mass man" agenda, it is critical that well-to-do white folk embrace degeneracy as much as anyone else, for universal degeneracy not only breaks down any surviving notion of supremacy, but it also helps to mold humanity into one form. Anything that allows all races to be reduced to the same dumbed-down level and made into pleasure-addicted morons is good for the multicultural agenda. Take for example the content of the material produced by the entertainment industry. Why is it always glamorizing degeneracy? Is it just a coincidence that there are so few songs and films about pride and tradition being promoted? It is not like they aren't out there...

Unfortunately, I'm afraid the freedoms in this country, such as the freedom of speech, are being taken advantage of and used to challenge honor, tradition, gods, morals, expectations, you-name-it. When it comes to using the freedom of speech to uphold these once-valued things, the entertainment industry turns a blind eye. No promotions or financial support follow, and then there is the kiss of death: the entertainment industry, particularly Jew-owned MTV, portrays things pertaining to cultural tradition as "uncool".

At the same time, an increasing number of non-Whites in America are being brought up in the same environments as Whites and raised within the same well-to-do culture. Increasingly, the only thing that stands out between whites and non-whites is the color of their skin. Thus, the immateriality of skin color becomes the standard to buck age-old stereotypes, to show that race is immaterial and destroy the racial basis of America's national existence. Affirmative Action serves a similar purpose: it redistributes wealth and puts non-Whites in high places based on quotas.

Overall, bringing Whites down and non-Whites up to "avenge past discrimination" relates to the theme of making the differences between the races indiscernible; after all, one will not fight for the survival of a race if he or she hardly knows that race to exist and be different in any way. The fewer things one can see that set the races apart, obviously aside from physical characteristics, the greater the chance that the call for white resistance will go unheeded. I write to you today to open your eyes and see what is going on. I urge you to answer that call. If the white peoples of this planet wish to have a future, they must resist the destruction of our peoples, their European identities and the standards they have set. The deliberate genocide continues, in part because of border policies by imposed by sell-out politicians, in part because of miscegenation, in part because of the assault on the family structure and low birth rate and in part because of the war on identity and world view. We must take a stand. Time is running out.

January 12, 2008

The truth about diversity

excerpt from "The Truth About Diversity", by Henry Makow, Ph.D.

We are all affected by "Diversity" but few understand its true nature.

Warning: It isn't pretty.

"Diversity" is a massive long-term behavior modification program that uses minorities to disinherit the majority. In English, "Diversity" means acknowledging different races, religions and "sexual orientations."

In New World Order Doublespeak, "Diversity" is a devious way to dilute and discriminate against the white, heterosexual Christian majority in Europe, Canada, Australia and the US.

While it pretends to advocate equality, its real goal is to guilt mainly heterosexual White males into yielding position and power. The object is to prepare North America and Europe for inclusion in a "world government" run by the central banking cartel based in London. This private cartel's power is measured by the fact that virtually every major corporation, educational institution and government agency provides "diversity training" (i.e. political indoctrination) to its employees. Even though studies show it has zero economic benefit, they spend eight billion dollars a year on it. Toyota alone plans to spend that much in the next ten years.

Here is an example of the shaming of Whites that takes place in these sessions. It is from the text, Seeing Ourselves: Exploring Race Ethnicity and Culture (1999) by Carl James.

A participant, Greg tells the group:

"As for my race, I am white but I never really had to think about it before. I don't feel that it ever affected the people with whom I associated or talked to. My two best friends are Black and (Canadian) Indian. I was brought up in a family that didn't believe in prejudice and I'm proud of that. If I don't like a person, it is because of their personality, not their race or heritage."

Now you'd think that Greg would pass with flying colors...

You didn't consider the hidden agenda. The author, a Diversity trainer, chastises Greg for assuming he is "the norm." Greg fails to acknowledge his "race privilege," that "invisible package of unearned assets" that is the "white colonial legacy." Whites like Greg deny "the ways in which they socially, culturally and politically produce relations of domination." (p.44)

In other words, Whites naturally oppress other people. That sounds like vicious racism to me.

Can you see what's happening? These Diversity sessions lay guilt trips on Whites, especially males, so they will yield power to compliant & grateful minorities who have not earned it. This is a scam. Anyone who objects to this political agenda commits career suicide. That's political persecution.

I want to be clear that I think the human race is one family and God loves all people equally. Like Greg, I believe people should be judged on their merit alone, regardless of race, gender or sexual orientation.

I have no problem with "minorities" winning positions of power so long as they do it fairly. I welcome the rich contribution immigrants make. I came to Canada when I was a baby in 1951.

But "Diversity" is not about fairness or enriching society. It promotes minorities not for their own sake, but as a way to undermine and control the majority.

IRONY

It's ironic that the central banking clique should lay this guilt trip on Whites when they are responsible for imperialism and wars past and present. They grew even richer through the slave and opium trades, and they control organized crime today through their agents.

The US population is more than 75% White and Christian. The plan is for Whites to become a minority by 2050 or sooner. Whites are expected to stand by and become guests in their own house.

When Whites are a minority, no one will champion their rights. There are two million more females than males at US universities. Have you heard of any affirmative action programs for males?

"Diversity" is practically unheard of in China, Japan, Israel, India and Latin America. These countries are allowed to keep their racial character. But because people of European origin have a sense of material, spiritual and political entitlement, they are the hardest to absorb in the New World Order. They are the targets of the "Diversity" program. (more)

January 10, 2008

De facto segregation in the United States

America's most segregated cities:


White/Black

1. Chicago, 84.6
2. New York, 82.2
3. Atlanta, 81.5
4. Washington, 79.7
5. Cleveland, 77.3
6. Newark, 76.7
7. Philadelphia, 76.4
8. Baltimore, 71.1
9. Houston, 70.9
10. Los Angeles, 70.6

White/Latino

1. Oakland, 69.9
2. New York, 67.1
3. Los Angeles, 65.6
4. Philadelphia, 64.3
5. Long Beach, 61.1
6. Milwaukee, 60.9
7. Dallas, 60.6
8. San Diego, 60.1
9. Washington, 59.4
10. Chicago, 59.2

White/Asian

1. New Orleans, 57.9
2. Newark, 55.4
3. Long Beach, 51.7
4. Detroit, 51.0
5. St. Paul, 50.6
6. Oakland, 50.3
7. Pittsburgh, 50.1
8. New York, 49.2
9. Philadelphia, 48.6
10. Atlanta, 48.1

Other cities of note:

San Francisco: 56.1, 53.1, 40.2
Seattle: 57.3, 34.5, 45.3
Boston: 69.8, 53.3, 39.6
St. Louis: 68.4, 30.3, 40.7
Phoenix: 49.2, 57.7, 23.8

Source: U.S. Census


How to use this data:

In Chicago, 84.6% of the black population would have to move in order for the city to have
equally-sized black and white populations.





More segregation data:





Chicago, IL




New York, NY




Atlanta, GA




Washington, D.C.




Cleveland, OH




Newark, N.J.




Philadelphia, PA




Baltimore, MD




Houston, TX




Los Angeles, CA




Seattle, WA




Miami, FL

January 9, 2008

Shoot out with Mexican police ends, three Americans arrested

from "3 Americans arrested after gun battle with Mexican police," by James C. McKinley Jr., International Herald Tribune

Three Americans were part of a well-armed gang that waged a gun battle with soldiers and police officers in Rio Bravo on Monday, the Mexican authorities said.

The battle demonstrated not only how dangerous the northern state of Tamaulipas has become in recent months, but also how Mexican drug cartels are recruiting gunfighters from the United States, who can cross the border with little trouble.

For more than a half-hour around noon, the streets of Rio Bravo turned into a war zone after federal agents tried to stop a van carrying three men with machine guns in full view. The men fired on the officers and then fled to a nearby house to join other members of their organization.

Machine-gun fire ripped the air and rocket-propelled grenades whizzed and exploded, as soldiers and federal agents surrounded the house and the gunmen tried to repel them, witnesses told local reporters. There were unconfirmed reports of two other skirmishes in other parts of the city around the same time.

Three gunmen were reported killed; 10 on the government side were wounded. Ten men were arrested on charges of taking part in the attack on the police.

One of those arrested, Esteban Valdez de los Santos, 30, is a Texas resident and an American citizen, the Mexican authorities said. The two other Americans arrested, Ricardo Zamora López, 32, and José Raúl González Sánchez, 35, are residents of Detroit.

"They're criminals, hitmen who work on this side of the border," José Patricio Patiño, a federal police commander, said Tuesday.

Speaking at a news conference in Mexico City, Patiño said all the gunmen, including the Americans, had worked for the Gulf Cartel, headed by Heriberto Lazcano, also known as El Lazca. (more)

January 8, 2008

NPD wins court battle, right to air commercial

It was a clear victory for free speech, open airwaves and most importantly, the integrity of the German democratic system.

Last week, a German high court ruled that a state broadcasting network could not deny a political party its right to air its commercial on the public broadcasting circuit. The decision overturns a previous court ruling and comes just weeks before the 2008 parliamentary elections in the German state of Hesse. The Frankfurt-based Hessischer Rundfunk television network "HR" had refused to air a commercial for the National Democratic Party, the NPD, saying that the party's platform constituted "incitement against the people."

Here's a look at the commercial:



So, in the commercial, we have a proposal to reduce the power of parliamentary lobbyists, retract student tuition costs, implement a 10€ minimum wage and issue motherhood and marriage bonuses...it also says Germany should deport foreign criminals and cut funds spent on foreign integration, Mosques and synagogues. Is this really "incitement against the people"?

The truth is the television network wanted to keep the NPD from the public eye, even at the cost of free speech itself. It is always interesting to see what happens when the goals of those who support social liberalization come into conflict with free speech, one of the very principles that liberalism gave birth to.

Consider the response of Yilmaz Memisoglu, a member of Hesse's foreigners' advisory council:

"democracy and the principle of equal chances in the elections don't mean that inhuman and racist ideas should be spread on public radio."
Or the response of Helmut Reitze, the director general of the HR:
"The cause of freedom of expression and the parties' freedom to campaign cannot lead to public broadcasters being forced to spread campaign messages that contain racist or inhuman ideology."
In the quoted responses, note how both speakers use highly-emotive buzzwords to try and reframe the broadcaster's decision to go against the law and give air time only to the political parties it approved of. There is no reason why the HR's "our opinion is worth more than democracy" decision should be applauded, especially when, like most television stations throughout Germany, the HR is funded and influenced by the very ruling elite the NPD opposes.

The HR broadcasting service is part a state-funded media group known as the ARD. The ARD is extremely influential in Germany. For example, it operates the international reporting Deutsche Welle, which broke the news about the HR's court battle with a predictable, pro-HR slant. The ARD is also involved in several joint projects, including the channels Phoenix, 3sat, and the children's television network, Kinderkanal. The ARD also controls the following networks:


The ARD's influence is different from that of the privately-owned web of media and communications control in the United States. Nevertheless, it yields the same result: control over the means to project world view and sanctioned opinions. The alternative to ARD programming is no different from what is available in the US: the same stations controlled by the same ten US-based media conglomerates.

When the eyes and ears of the public are controlled by the same source with the same opinions, the people are incredibly vulnerable, as they are only seeing and hearing what the ruling regime or its ideological allies want to or can afford to show. As it stands, the elite's considerations regarding the future existence of the German people go only as far as their devotion to multiculturalism and tolerance, and subservience to foreign influence, will allow. Five of the six strongest political parties would probably consider it "racist" and "inhumane" for the German people to wish for their nation to retain its German character. To propose a break from policies giving jobs and opportunities to the increasing number of non-Germans, that too, would be seen as "racist" and "inhumane." In fact, the entire German system seems to value liberalism more than the future of the German people, and the language of the German constitution is the best example of that. Parties like the NPD see this as a problem, which is why they are labelled "racist" and "inhumane" by others. In other words, majority opinion is crushing minority opinion and, in the case of the HR, trying to use its power and influence to silence that minority.

For that reason, it does not matter whether one supports the NPD's platform, what matters his that he or she supports the right to dissent and hear the opposition in a true democracy. The court decision against the HR was a clear victory for freedom - the freedom of discourse and the freedom to use one's own eyes and ears to construct his or her opinion.

January 6, 2008

How can you be so stupid?


Recently, I came across the above picture, which was said to be taken at a pro-illegal immigration rally. It is hard not to be overcome by the irony: a tall, neatly-groomed Nordic woman, sporting a tote bag and trendy shades, advocating a political philosophy which will flood the United States with Mexicans and other Latinos, thus eliminating opportunities for people of her stock, stripping her of her luxuries and turning over majority sovereignty to people like Ms. Yo Estoy En Mi Continente, marching a few steps behind her in the same rally:

  © Blogger template 'Isolation' by Ourblogtemplates.com 2008

Back to TOP